In all honesty Gordon Brown was the most impressive in person. He came across to the audience as authoritative, hugely intelligent yet personable (when he wasn’t exaggerating the contents of his I-pod). It made me wonder why his communications staff are so insistent on turning him into a clone of Tony Blair? Especially since this particular tactic is failing so miserably (remember that YouTube smile) and being mastered so brilliantly by his opposite number. As Prime Minister what’s wrong with being high brow? What’s wrong with preferring Bach and Beethoven over U2? What’s wrong with being obsessive about facts and figures? Why does a Prime Minister need to be a showman all of a sudden? What’s wrong with being a heavyweight? His current media plan is blatantly not working and looks like sending him and the rest of the Labour party to electoral doom.
I came out of yesterday's Q and A with Brown experiencing a strange sensation - as if I had just seen a dead man walking. I also came out thinking that if his media strategy was different then he wouldn’t be 17 points behind in the polls.
So how does he compare with Cameron? Despite the obvious passion for his brand of conservativism and his mastery of the Tony Blair way of doing things you can’t escape the fact that when DC’s answering a question it feels like he’s trying to sell you something - “and would you like our comprehensive insurance package with that?”. This makes you wonder - does he truly mean what he just said or is he saying it because it’s makes strategic sense to do so? It might just be that age and a few grey hairs make him more convincing in person - his whiter than white polished aura does make you think that he’s been groomed for power.
And Clegg? An affable chap is how one would describe Nick Clegg. Clegg like Brown does seem to have true belief in his message but it’s almost as if he knows that not many other people do. A ruddy nice fellow, but does he share the same aura as the other two? The aura that Prime Ministers have? I’m not sure he does.
All three have their strengths and weaknesses and it might well be that on a different day I would write a totally different article - but those are my genuine thoughts and impressions after meeting all 3.
I would say that a Presidential style debate between the three come election time would be fascinating and I would love them to have the courage to do it, but I doubt their communications teams have the balls.
Keep your thoughts coming in
Dewi Un
4 comments:
Dewi Un - like your observations and your candour. And your 'dead man walking' insight makes me sad. It's all gone so horribly, horribly wrong. Nor am I entirely convinced that the dead man's to blame.
It also makes me ponder: imagine had Gordon, and not our Tone, been PM first ... . Imagine. Would things now be better - or worse?
More, and possibly less, importantly: has yon Mr Blair made shininess a prerequisitite quality for PM? If nothing else, the clash of the shinies (TB -v- DC) would have made fascinating veiwing - each attempting to outslick the other ... and us!
I too like Nick Clegg, he has a passion for what he does, but not the skill or the cunning to get anywhere.
And where does little ol' Wales come into this exactly? Is Brown going to stop recruiting our unemployed young people and send them off to be needlessly killed? (Come to think of it, are you volunteering?) Or taking our taxes to spend on imperialist nuclear weapons rather than necessary public services?
He might be more fluffy than you thought, but he is still a war-mongering neo-conservative. Those are not Welsh values. On the real issues he is just another British nationalist.
Cameron reminds me of a used car salesman. I don't trust him at all. Brown lost all credibility when he refused to hold a general election back in 2007. He's given us noting on electoral reform. He's wasted his tenure by trying to introduce discredited idea like longer detention for so called "terrorist" suspects.
The only one who appears to have any decent ideas for constitutional change (electoral reform and a democratic lords) is Clegg. The Lib-Dems also seem to be the only ones with any economic nouse.
But then the Lib-Dems are handicapped by our undemocratic electoral system that gives total power to one of the two main minority parties.
Post a Comment